CO129-377 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1911 [5] — Page 134

and pattion to the Secretary of State

to the extent rejaved to above

I think this creum

absolutely fale

stance lays open Howell's conduct to

further consume

and

callo

for

sideration of the whole

cavad

affects his retention in the

It is,

That

The came

отл

Matãs, and

of

however, mecessar

the

so very

Necom

as it Dennie.

to point

neuspaper report of

very defective that except from the

the annexme

regando

строг attached to the chirp

Very uncertain

Justice's letter, it is very

where any of these transaction's took

ampto

place.

annexine

to the Chief Justices

lotter shows that the transaction regarding "the ordering

teamed

Boutter from Johnson

Дер

1897.

As it is possible that

"Each of the other hamractions in questions

C

also took place 14 years ago, and the Secretary of State might regard such a

Externating arcumstance

fact

من

? Wire for the approximate dates

of the several business transactions which referred to para. I of the Chief Justic

Ae.

letter to the Governor.

3

ST. Indor

137

Mr. Fiddes

There is no need to tel. I think.

I would

write back and ass for the dates of toe cusiness transact

tions referred to by Mr. Tudor

•

it seons clear from

par.

3 of the C.d.

s latter that some of then too.

place fairly recently and say that Mr. Howell should

be called on to explain how he reconciles these trans- ¦

cations with his assurances contained in his reply to

the Col. Sec. and repeated in his Petition to the S. of

S.

M. Shibl

the 1946 TCM: 21/6

Prd. 21

Remenid ?

Reply nomin

7

alone

Ay. Ley. Art. 157

"